This
month I was hoping to prove our family connection to the Michael and Bridget Leahy living in Dublin city
in the 1830s and 1840s. They christened a daughter Alicia Lehey
in the Pro-Cathedral in January 1833, before moving to St Andrew’s parish,
where Michael Lahey was christened in January 1835, followed by Timothy Lahy in January
1840 and Mary Leahy in March 1842.
Alicia
Leahy was my great-great-granny’s name and she had a known sister, Mary. Their
parents were Michael and Bridget Leahy. Mary claimed she was born in Dublin
city about 1842.[1] So, on the surface at least, this family looks like a shoo-in.
And,
on the plus side, there was only one marriage of an Alicia Leahy found in the online
church records for Dublin city, and that was my great-great-grandmother’s marriage
to John Byrne in 1867. And, when paired with parents Michael and Bridget, the only marriage of a Mary
Leahy found was that of my great-great-grandaunt to Christopher Radcliffe in
1866. Sometimes, what you don’t find is as informative as what you do, and I
didn’t find another potential Leahy family in the city.
There
was no sign of a subsequent marriage for Timothy christened in 1840,
but a one-year-old infant with the same name, and an address in Leeson Lane in
St Andrew’s parish, was buried in Glasnevin Cemetery in 1841.[2] Which leaves only Michael to trace forward…
And,
a Michael Leahy of 26 Cuffe Street, Dublin, married Ellen Hyland on 6 December
1854, in St Peter’s Church of Ireland. His father was also Michael Leahy. They both
worked as servants.
However,
Michael claimed he was ‘of full age’ when he married Ellen, i.e. over
twenty-one years old, and the Michael christened in 1835 would have been barely
twenty. Still, he could have overstated his age. Minors required parental
consent to marry and it might not have been forthcoming. Perhaps his parents
were already dead, or maybe they objected to him marrying a Protestant.
It
wasn’t uncommon in mixed marriages then for some of the children to be baptised
Protestant and others Catholic, and this was the case here. I’m not sure yet quite
what to make of the delayed baptism dates.
Child
|
Birth date
|
Baptism
|
Home Address
|
Parish
|
Elisha
|
23 Mar 1857
|
27
Mar 1857
|
27
Cuffe St
|
St
Nicholas, RC
|
Helena
|
27
Aug 1860
|
26
Sep 1862
|
19
Albert Pl
|
St
Andrew, RC
|
Mary
Bridget
|
1 Feb
1863
|
16
Feb 1863
|
35
Erne St
|
St
Andrew, RC
|
Mary
Anne
|
15
Mar 1862
|
6 Dec
1863
|
35
Upper Erne St
|
St
Mark, COI
|
Michael
|
24
Nov 1865
|
6 Dec
1865
|
35
Upper Erne St
|
St
Mark, COI
|
Nonetheless,
their Godparents’ names suggest Michael belonged to my target Leahy family -
Maria Leahy sponsored Elisha’s baptism, while Alice Leahy sponsored Mary
Bridget’s. If these children were baptised later, after my Alicia and Mary had
taken their husband’s surnames, they’d have been easier to claim as my family – or not.
More
tellingly, perhaps, my great-great-grandmother was generally called Alicia, pronounced
a-LEE-sha – not usually Alice - and not just in church records known to
favour a Latinised form. Perhaps Michael and Ellen chose this name for their eldest
daughter too, and the priest wrote it as Elisha. Both names sound
similar. Plus, it’s doubtful the priest meant it as a Latinised form of
Elizabeth, given the next child in that register was named Elizabetha. Maybe this is indicative
of a familial relationship.
Fathers’
occupations are normally recorded in civil marriage registers. But, when Mary
married Christopher the information was omitted entirely. He was expressly
described as having ‘no trade’ when Alicia married John. And on Mary’s marriage
to Michael Power, in Co. Dublin in 1873, he was listed as a clerk. He was never
described as a servant, like in Michael’s marriage. Yet, you must admit, my
third great-grandfather’s occupation is uncertain. And, my Leahy family worked
in domestic service – Alicia’s husband was a butler, and before her marriage,
Mary was a servant.[3]
Finally,
for now, Michael’s address in Cuffe Street at the time of his marriage creates another ‘coincidence’. The
address given for my third-great-grandparents in 1867 was also Cuffe Street, though
by 1873, they were supposedly in ‘Co. Meath’.
There are still too many question marks hanging over my Leahy family to offer
a conclusion, but I do know, it’s the absence of these ‘little coincidences’ that
usually signals the death-knell for my genealogy theories. So, I’ll keep on trucking…
Main source: Church records on IrishGenealogy.ie; Ireland Roman Catholic Parish Marriages', Findmypast.
………………
©
Black Raven Genealogy
I admire your restraint. I'd be tempted to say, "Case closed."
ReplyDeleteIf only I had something linking this family to Alicia or Mary after their marriages - then, I might be happy, and it might also help if I had not completely lost their trail after Michael was christened in Nov. 1865.
DeleteWell, there are just enough open questions not to close the case quite yet...but it looks like you're hot on the trail! Good luck.
ReplyDeleteThanks Marian, it's good to hear others agree it's a good hypothesis - when I struggle to find 'the proof', I sometimes imagine I might suffer from wishful thinking.
DeleteDefinitely seems you're on the right track! Good Luck getting that final piece to lock it in.
ReplyDeleteLove reading your blog!
Thanks a million, Leslie.
DeleteI also think you are on the right track, hopefully you'll find some other proof that links it all together.
ReplyDeleteThank you for reading and leaving a comment, Svetlana, I appreciate it.
DeleteDara, your research is amazing. I hope you can answer all your questions and say, "This is my family!"
ReplyDeleteThat is such a lovely compliment from you Colleen, I do enjoy following your research too. and it would be great to definitively claim them as mine.
Delete