This
week, as I continued my genealogy research into the lives of Laurence and Bridget Coyle, I came across the most disturbing
case of murder ever perpetrated in the city of Dublin. Even today, although the
case is now long forgotten, it likely remains one of the most fiendish atrocities
ever to have shocked the country.
The
victim, Thomas Maguire, was a handsome boy with dark curly hair, about ten years of age. He was found by children at
play in a stable lane to the rear of Pembroke Road. His throat was cut from
ear to ear. It was five days before Christmas in 1841.
A
man named John Delahunt went to the police, claiming to have witnessed the
murder. The police became suspicious, arrested him and placed him in custody. At the inquest, Delahunt claimed he
saw a woman wearing a large red and green plaid shawl kill the child.
During
the trial, John Delahunt continued to deny any responsibility for the attack.
He tried to put the blame on the child’s mother, except that poor woman had an air-tight alibi. She was giving birth to a new baby at the Lying-In-Hospital, leaving no one to mind her son.
Sadly
for John Delahunt, it was his own family who presented much of the evidence
against him. Margaret Delahunt, his sister-in-law, testified Delahunt
called to her home in Little Britain Street on the afternoon in question, with the
child in tow. The boy, who she swore was the victim, told her his name was Tommy
Maguire. Elizabeth and Anne Weldon, her sister and mother, testified they were
present that evening when Delahunt returned to the house and they heard
Margaret asking him where he had left the child.
Margaret
Delahunt also confirmed the murder weapon as her property - her only knife. It had
gone missing that day and she had seen Delahunt sharpening it the
Saturday before. Other witnesses placed Delahunt near the scene of the crime.
The jury deliberated for only twenty minutes before returning a guilty verdict
and Delahunt was sentenced to death.
The
only motive put forward, and the only one mentioned in Delahunt’s eventual confession,
was financial. He had previously presented evidence, later discredited, in the
trial of a tinker charged with the murder. He had also testified,
again unconvincingly, against some coal porters charged with assault. In both
cases the prosecution had paid a fee to their witnesses. Delahunt admitted he had killed the child in the hope of obtaining a financial reward when he helped the
prosecutor convict an innocent party of murder. His was probably not the
sharpest of minds.
So
how are we related to John Delahunt? Not closely, I’m relieved to say. Ten
years after the trial, Joseph Coyle, Laurence and Bridget’s eldest son and Dad's great-granduncle, married Elizabeth Weldon. Elizabeth was a sister
of Margaret Delahunt, the key prosecution witness who was married to John
Delahunt’s brother. Elizabeth served as a prosecution witness herself. While
this is a genealogical near-miss for our family, I’m sure none of them ever
forgot their close association with the notorious culprit who lost his life in the
first public hanging in more than forty years.
At
noon on 5 February 1842, John Delahunt was hung in front of a large gathering
at Kilmainham Gaol. The assembled multitudes, appalled at the abhorrent crime, numbered
well in excess of 10,000 people. Another account of the awful ceremony put the crowd
closer to 60,000 people. All the buildings facing ‘the drop’ were full of
spectators who had paid dearly for the view.
In
the end, death came quickly for the young man who was paralysed with fear as he
faced the revulsion of the crowd. Surprisingly, the only sound John Delahunt heard
during his final moments was the gentle hum of prayer seeking mercy for his
unfortunate soul.
John Delahunt, Murderer, 1842
Dublin
Evening Post, 5 February 1842, p. 3
|
Sources: The Dublin Weekly Register,
24 December 1841, p. 6; The Clare Journal,
20 January 1841, pp 1,4; Dublin Evening Post,
5 February 1842, p. 3; Freeman’s Journal,
7 February 1842, p.3; The Vindicator,
Belfast, 9 February 1842 – accessed Findmypast.ie.
……………………
©
Black Raven Genealogy
Dara, a shocking crime and a reprehensible motive. It appears as though John Delahunt may not have been of sound mind. The public interest in observing his hanging is fascinating too. (It would probably be streamed live these days.) Glad to know John Delahunt is a 'genealogical near-miss' for you.
ReplyDeleteNo doubt such a popular event would have been streamed live. We can only be thankful that the world has moved on.
DeleteWhat an incredible, and very sad, story! And, I'm sure this did impact your family, even if there hadn't been a marriage between Joseph and Elizabeth. I'm guessing this story would've been talked about in the area for many years.
ReplyDeleteIt saddened me too, Dana, no doubt his family loved him and could never come to terms with what he had done, and as you say, I doubt they were ever allowed to forget his crime.
ReplyDeleteWhat a incredibly sad story for everyone involved. I have an ancestor who was brutally murdered and I was so surprised to read about the huge crowd that showed up for the murderer's hanging. So glad that we have other forms of entertainment today.
ReplyDeleteWhat people did for entertainment then - reminds me of Roman times when thousands turned up watch people fight to the death or be fed to the lions - gruesome.
DeleteIncredible story, and so sad. Brilliantly told. So far, I've found the son of a 3rd great aunt was killed but the perpetrator (rightfully in my mind) got off on a ruling of justifiable homicide, My relative was your basic juvenile delinquent bad guy who went too far and got nailed for it (& died). Not as bad as this chap though.
ReplyDeleteI remember that story Jo, it was still sad, even though he was a wayward youth.
DeleteWas there a death mask taken at the time , I seem to remember a reference to one. As a youngster I was in the former Family home and heard references. What happened to Ms Stokes. Who undertook his Legal Defence? does anyone know
ReplyDeleteSorry Anthony, I did not come across anything about a death mask, but the whole extent of my knowledge of the case came from historic newspapers articles. According to the papers, a Mr. Walsh cross-examined the witnesses for the defence.
ReplyDelete